0.000000
0.000000
I love Jesus, Mama, Granny, and Pa.
Daughter, Grandson, Sisters… My Darling Wife who gives her all.
My daddy, and…. a whole lot of cousins I barely ever knew.
I loved music, horses, cooking and dogs.
Cats adopted me, so, I fed their cause,
Actually found myself in love with them, allergies, paws and all.
How awesome they’ve all been… Why now do I see stained glass
visuals of King David dancing naked with his harp before all the kingdom?..
Yet, only an audience of two?
The “One” he danced for, was all the inspiration he needed to perform,
Though, the one peering from the window above in disdain, saw not the Art at all.
Willis-©-2012
desolate_by_hoddie1[1] photobucket
Source of animated follow the leader image unknown.
“City of Enoch”
In the last chapter, we left off looking for the river, Pison, the river in which the Bible says encompasses the whole land of Havila, where there is gold. The most obvious thing for us to do therefore, would be to look for where the land of Havila was located. If you are like me, however, and have searched through dozens of documented studies, professions, guesses and possibilities as to where the land of Havila was located, you may throw your hands in the air and say…yeah, fat chance of that. Well, I admit that was my initial response anyway. Nonetheless, though it may still call for some speculation, I believe that you will have to agree with me after I point out what I have found on the matter, that Havila, was right there under our noses all along. At least, if in fact the Holy Bible is one of the places you were looking while you searched through countless hypotheses, theories, maps, and of course, the occasional “Ancient Alien” paper chase flight to planet X. Yeah, that does seem to be one of the more overly published areas of interest on the subject of who may have built the great Pyramid of Giza. Not that I totally discount the possibility of a 12th planet out there somewhere, or deny that there are some intriguing works of ancient art found on the walls of many caves, mountain tops and deserted islands. It’s just that I have found much more concrete evidences aligning with what the Word of God has said on the subject of who created me, than I have seen in any of the theories of ancient Nibirbian space pilots, coming to alter the DNA of Neanderthal for the purpose of creating a work force to harvest the abundant surplus of gold here on planet earth.
Okay, I apologize. Once again I have allowed my frustrations of being side tracked from my research by some crazy alien astronaut
story to keep me from focusing on the subject at hand. And I apologize again. But, you know those stories are a little captivating once you begin to read them, and …wow, I wonder how they were able to find a bird with a head as big as a human to create those ..?Oh, sorry, there I go again… so…where was I…? Oh yeah, harvesting gold…Genesis 2:11
The name of the first is Pison: that is it which compasseth the whole land of Havilah, where there is gold;
Where could the land of Havila be…? And the river Pison, wow, I’m off track here.
“City of Enoch”
As long as there have been inquiring minds about the validity, and location of the Garden of Eden, which the writer of the book of Genesis speaks of, there have been seekers of the river Pison, (Pee-Shone), as well as the elusive river Gehon, ( Ghee-Khone). Both lost in antiquity to us today. Or, at least as far as the Biblical names pertaining to the two rivers related to the two we do still know the names and locations of anyway, the Heddekel, (Tigris in Greek,) and the Euphrates. Many attribute the Pison river to the Phasis, which was looked upon as a (god-river ) in Greek Mythology, which, we will not get into at this time. The Phasis’s head waters came from atop the Caucasus mountains, and meandered themselves through the lush foliage of that range through Colchis, and into the Black Sea.
The river is still there today, however, it is known as the Rioni river. I only mention this particular river in detail, as it could quite possibly resurface within our research at another time based on a theory that was mentioned in this study back in Chapter 2. That particular theory, or hypotheses, is one that proposes the cradle of civilization as possibly being, not in Turkey, Africa, or even Mesopotamia, but, in the Kaukasos Mountains. (Caucasas) NOTE to readers; I personally found no racially motivated purpose, or influences within the study, and recommend it for review. Reference:
A book published in part, from 1923-1927, entitled: ” The Deluged Civilization of the Caucasus Isthmus” by Reginald Aubrey Fessenden
The allegorical significances within the Genesis original language, and symbolism’s, as a preliminary view of the Gospel of Jesus Christ, though, I will not veer off course of this study to elucidate as the words and meanings speak for themselves anyway, are unmistakably spelled out to those who are familiar with the Gospel story.
Here, on the other hand, we find ourselves looking for clues that may have been given to us in just the few verses of Genesis to where we might find, Paradise, which, of course could, if the river, and land masses in the Mesopotamia area are the same today, as back then lead us to the first city ever built, the City of Enoch. (According to the Canonical Genesis version anyway, as Josephus expounds from the Holy Scripts taken from the 70 A.D. 2nd Temple that ( Nod ) was the first city built by Cain, and Enoch was the second city built in honor of his son ) Therefore, we will begin with the first clue found in Genesis 2.
Genesis 2:11
The name of the first is Pison: that is it which compasseth the whole land of Havilah, where there is gold;
As we have already pointed out, there are many existing rivers, with modern names that incalculable hoards of historians through-out time have pointed to and claimed; (This is the Pison)!!) Of course, then I suppose after all is said and done throughout the extent of this study, we, or, at least I, will probably be no different. Still, unsatisfied with any of the many hypotheses, and designated studies I have come across as of yet in my search as to where the elusive river of Pison just may be, I must leave my own signature as my claim to famed mark on History, after all, Everyone is entitled to my opinion!!!
The following is a list of only a few details, and clues that I have come across in my search for the River Pison.
#1 The name Pison in the original language: (from Net Bible) Strongs #06376: Nwvyp Piyshown = Increase #2 Many Bible interpretations list it as the: Pishon, = Changing at the mouth, or wide spread. #3 Other versions relate the name Pishon, to springing forward, spread about...etc ( Swamp Maybe ?)
Well, those really could describe pretty much any river, sleuth, swamp, or stream anywhere in the World practically, therefore, I digress. What seems more important, and more likely to locate with any possible chance of accuracy might rather be the land of Hevila, the place that the Bible says that the river encompassed, and had lots of gold. In fact, the next verse in Genesis after Genesis 2:11, also adds that the gold found there was a very high quality gold. Not only, but, it also gives us a few clues as to what other precious commodities could be found in Hevila.
And the gold of that land is good: there is bdellium and the onyx stone.
“City of Enoch”
We will begin our search for the ancient city of Enoch, by first pinpointing the most reasonably accepted location of the Garden of Eden, based on the evidences that we have, starting with the Genesis 2 account. The Genesis rendering of the location goes as follows:
And the LORD God planted a garden eastward in Eden; and there he put the man whom he had formed. 9And out of the ground made the LORD God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil. 10And a river went out of Eden to water the garden; and from thence it was parted, and became into four heads. 11The name of the first is Pison: that is it which compasseth the whole land of Havilah, where there is gold; 12And the gold of that land is good: there is bdellium and the onyx stone. 13And the name of the second river is Gihon: the same is it that compasseth the whole land of Ethiopia. 14And the name of the third river is Hiddekel: that is it which goeth toward the east of Assyria. And the fourth river is Euphrates.
If you will notice, I have raised certain words in bold print within the foregoing Genesis passage. The reason of my highlighting those words is to point out that the Genesis writer called these 10 places, or at least those with proper noun assignments, by their post-diluvian titles. In other words, regardless of who we attribute the writing of the book of Genesis to, whether it be Moses, or whomever, we surely know that the book was written after the flood, and therefore, those places would bare the names in which the Author was familiar with during his life time. This is an important bit of information for us to make note of in our study, as you soon will see. As I pointed out earlier, the writer of Genesis went to great lengths to show definitive landmarks, and locations, clearly expecting his readers to recognize, and identify with the locations based on his descriptions. That being said, we will now go back into the Bible and see what, if any possible clues it may offer as to where Eden was located.
Ezekiel 27:23
Haran, and Canneh, and Eden, the merchants of Sheba, , and Asshur and Chilmad, were thy merchants.
Here we see that Ezekial refers to Eden as being an actual area , or town, existing during his time, while delivering a message from God , and pointing out some of the merchants that traded with the great city of Tyre. All of which, run in sequence within the verse, just as their geographical locations would be seen on a map, or an aerial view ( as our study will show) of Southern Babylonia. Hence, we will take a closer look now at that localized area, the names, and explore the modern day excavations and archeological findings, to see if a picture isn’t after all, still worth a thousand words. But, first let me point out that Babylonia was located in the area later known as Mesopotamia, which is Greek for: (Between the two Rivers) The map seen here can be viewed in more detail, along with other detailed information, and links @ BIBLE HISTORY.COM What we see on this map of the ancient Babylonia area aligns the two ( Presently named and identified today,) rivers described in the book of Genesis account almost as precisely as one could ask for. Undoubtedly, it also shows us that the trade rout along those rivers, especially when considering that most of the earths population, in those days were located within the same general area, was the most efficient possible scenario for it’s time, and would even be unto this present day. The next map that we see shows more of the then (Genesis Writers) names of the towns, as well as what they were called in a much later time in history, ie; (Assher/Assyria,) by the time of the fall of Samaria, ( Israel, ) to the Assyrians, in 722 B.C. The red line in the map shows the trail that the deported Israelites would have been marched off from Samaria into Assyria, and the Median provinces. I only added this map to help us to see the changes and to stay on track with the two named rivers in the Genesis 2 account, of the Euphrates, and the Tigris, ( Hiddekel.) In our continued search, however, I will turn your attention, and mine, to the not so spelled out, nor easily authenticated names, and locations of the other two rivers, beginning with the first one in which the Genesis writer labels as the “Pison“. (Strongs #06376>Pee-Shone) As one attempts to locate, or equate this river to another known river of the more modern times, (as many have attributed it to dozens) they will soon realize that it is not an easy task to say the least. One could rely on the countless geographical studies, maps, outlines and reviews of the equally innumerable experts, geologist, and Bible land explorers from the past to determine which, if any of the many rivers in the ocean of possibilities could be the river Pison. However, in doing so, one will succumb to the realization, that in the end of all the reading, mapping, googeling, study and gasps, they will still have to either rely on eenie meanie, miney mo, or the casting of lots to choose one. Other than praying for divine revelation into the matter, in which, I have certainly done, I have decided to go with a more personal, technique, or at least, a personal study rather than to rely on someone else’s predetermined conclusion in the matter, and that technique is one of deductive reasoning based on the clues that we are given, beginning in the beginning of it all…the Genesis account.
Genesis 2:11
The name of the first is Pison: that is it which compasseth the whole land of Havilah, where there is gold;
c
” City of Enoch “
As you may recall from the previous chapter, the city of Enoch spoken of here, was according to the book of Genesis, the first city ever built on earth. According to the scriptures, Cain built this city and named it Enoch, in honor of his son, who was also named Enoch. This Enoch, However, as we stipulated in an earlier chapter was not the same Enoch which the Genesis account tells us walked with God, and was taken into heaven. Here we will show where we believe the first city was located, based on Biblical information, geographical, and archeological reasoning, as well as information found on tablets of Sumerian cuneiform languages and lore.
For centuries secular, and religious, philosophers, both scientific and theological, have debated the validity of the Genesis writer’s depiction of the Garden of Eden, and the birth place of civilization. The allegorical significances of the stories throughout the book of Genesis, as well as the Bible itself, are undeniable to say the least. Today, however, with the unearthing of archeological evidences, languages, and ancient cities throughout the regions where the Bible tells us all of this took place circa 5000 years ago, many of the most skeptical of historical thinkers astonishingly admit an undeniable realization, that at least some historical significance and validity lies within the Biblical account of the birthplace of humankind. I feel it is important to point out that the writer of Genesis definitely put forth much effort in his writings, to descriptively locate for the reader, many detailed geographical points of references, and landmarks. These places of reference are with us yet today, and for that reason alone, I feel that there was an absolute , definitive and historical purpose in the mind of the writer of Genesis. Allegories, and fairy tales rarely use actual geographical locations, let alone give such a detailed and traceable layout for the readers, either presently alive, or to possibly exist thousands of years later. Albeit, there are still at least two views of what the writings are all about, and the one of the more liberal acceptance would be of just a location where a mythical tale unfolds. Nonetheless, the reality that the actual location existed, and does still today, has become more and more difficult for anyone to ignore or contradict. The ensuing study therefore, will be offered to the reader with the authors embracing of the Genesis account at face value, and as a literal, and historical narrative. After all, if it was good enough for the writers of the New Testament, and Jesus himself to validate for us as an actual historical account, then it is good enough for me. I base this belief not only by faith, but also on much study into the validity and historical evidence of the existence of Yeshua, (Jesus, ) and his followers.Keeping the subject matter of the previous chapter in mind, I will begin by expounding on some of its content as well as examining some different theories pertaining to the “Sons of God “. First of all, there are three majorly accepted views of who the Bible is speaking of when it states: the “Sons of God” in Genesis 6, where we see : Genesis 6: 4 There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.
The first theory, or belief that we will take a look at is the most widely accepted among the more conservative scholars, and conservatively speaking, is probably the easiest to accept. This belief holds that the Sons of God were the Sons of Seth, thought to be the righteous of God, who intermarried with the wicked Daughters of Cain, creating a super-human race. Those who oppose this theory, or at least many who do, say that it is based on the assumption that Seth’s sons were the Sons of God, as the Bible never states that they were. Those who make this claim also point out that the Bible only has this to say about Seth’s first son, Enos, ( Which stands for “Frail”, or “Mortal “)
Genesis 4:26
And to Seth, to him also there was born a son; and he called his name Enos: then began men to call upon the name of the LORD. It is also a part of their argument that there is more than one interpretation of the last part of this verse, one being : Then began men to call their gods, ( idols, ) by the name of Jehovah.
They also pose the question; If this interpretation actually meant that this was the first time people began to call upon the Lord, then who did Seth, and Adam call to. Which, I will admit raises a rather strong argument. I was able to find one instance which took place after the flood, where God was angered by the Israelites calling Baal, by His name: Or, was probably saying, “Stop calling Baal, God” ?
Hosea 2:16
And it shall be at that day, saith the LORD, that thou shalt call me Ishi; and shalt call me no more Baali.
However, if we look in the 3rd Chapter of the Book of Luke, in the lineage of Jesus, we do find this: Luke 3:23 And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli, 24Which was the son of —- and so on until-—-38Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God.—
Still, those opposed to the theory that the “Sons of God” were the sons of Seth, who married with the daughters of Cain, also claim that the sons of Seth were not shown to be more righteous than any of the other people on earth, and that the Bible says that God destroyed all mankind except for Noah and his family, who were the only righteous people found on the earth. In light of the Luke 3, lineage of Joseph, and the fact that Seth was long since passed away, as well as his immediate family of sons, and that Noah was a son of Seth, respectively, I can not dismiss the possibility that
the Bible, when used as the only source, could have been speaking of the sons of Seth in the passage referring to the “Sons of God”. As I have mentioned in an earlier chapter, depending on which Bible Manuscript one uses, Methuselah, Noah’s Grandfather is said to have either lived till the same year that the flood came, or, 14 years after the flood. Fourteen years after the flood According to the Vaticanus Septuagint.
Nevertheless, there is still one problem in the way of accepting the theory that the Bible was speaking of the “Sons of Seth” in Genesis 6:2-4, and that being the Hebrew wording used for “Sons of God”. Throughout the old testament the wording (benei ha-elohim ) is used a total of 5 times, and here are the other 4 in sequence. Daniel 3:25 25 “Look!” he answered, “I see four men loose, walking in the midst of the fire; and they are not hurt, and the form of the fourth is like the Son of God.”[a] ( Note that the New King James version has a click-able footnote … which gives the more accurate, most recently translated meaning for the designation,” Son of God” )
This interpretation is also found in most newer versions of the Bible, and simply states: ( son of the gods )
In the Daniel passage, this would definitely seem more accurate, as Nebuchadnezzar was not yet familiar with the Hebrew religion and it’s entities . Not to mention that as far as we know from what the Bible out right tells us, Jesus was the only “Begotten” son of God, and not until He was born in the little town of Bethlehem was God incarnate through Christ to live among people on earth, something most of Jewry still haven’t grasped from the scriptures, let alone Nebuchadnezzar. He certainly could not have envisioned what “THE SON OF GOD” (JESUS ) would look like 500 years before Jesus was born, but would most likely have been referring to something that the “Babylonian” religion would have been familiar with. ( Whether real or not,) It may be important to point out here, (benei ha-elohim ) in the Old Testament in at least all but the possible verse in question refers to Angels, whether good or bad.
Job 1:6
Now there was a day when the ( sons of God ) came to present themselves before the LORD, and Satan came also among them. If it wasn’t clear in this verse that “Presenting themselves before the Lord” meant literally in Heaven, the next verse seems to answer that question soundly enough.
Job 1:7
And the LORD said unto Satan, Whence comest thou?Then Satan answered the LORD, and said, From going to and fro in the earth, and from walking up and down in it.
We would be hard pressed to claim that the “Sons of God” spoken of in the previous two passages were “Not” Angelic beings.
But, even once more in the book of Job we see the same wording; and in the Hebrew it is once again : ( benei ha-elohim)
Job 2:1 New King James Version
[ Satan Attacks Job’s Health ] Again there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the LORD, and Satan came also among them to present himself before the LORD.
In the final usage of the designation: (Sons of God/benei ha-elohim ) in the Old Testament, there is no doubt as to whom the scriptures were referring to, as man had not yet been created.
In Job 38:4, God asked Job, where were thou when I laid the foundation of the earth…and Job 38:7 reads as follows: